Strengthen the learning of CNAS qualification software evaluation reports by technical personnel
In order to comply with the requirements of the CNAS Software Evaluation Laboratory for improving the quality capabilities of software evaluation, evaluators must better follow GB/T 25000.51-2016 "Systems and Software Engineering - Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Part 51:" To conduct software evaluation in accordance with the "Quality Requirements and Test Details for Ready Available Software Products (RUSP)", not only in the business stage, but also in all aspects such as the construction of evaluation process norms, evaluation technical capabilities, process documentation, determination of test defects, and review of CNAS software evaluation reports, learning and relearning are necessary.
Regarding the compilation of software evaluation reports for CNAS qualifications, after conducting software evaluations based on the software evaluation and testing standards of the evaluation laboratory, technicians must strictly follow the report template provided by the national accreditation review group of the laboratory to write the software evaluation report. It is strictly prohibited for technicians to privately modify the report template.
Summary of the Evaluation Report (Table)
Sample name and version number: The sample name and version number must be consistent with the product name and version number in the contract or tender document
Entrusting entity: Fill in the name of the entrusting entity and other information
Generating unit: That is, the name of the development unit of the software product under test
Testing unit: That is, the name of the evaluation laboratory
Test type
Sample content and quantity
Sample acceptance date
Sample testing date
2. Evaluation Conclusion
The assessment conclusion is a description of the Beijing basis, basis, content and conclusion of this assessment
3. Signatures and seals of the testers, reviewers and authorizers
4. Evaluation basis and cited documents
The main points are the test basis and an explanation of the source of the test basis
5. Description of the tested piece
System Overview: Provide a comprehensive description of the software under test, including the software's development language, application platform, the functions it implements, and the conveniences it can bring to users, etc.
Scope of the software under test: Description of the configuration items of the software under test
6. Test Overview
Test type
Test environment: including server-side, client-side, network and other environments
Evaluation process: That is, the arrangement of the evaluation work activities and the implementation plans for each work content
7. Details of test results
Describe how many sets of test cases were involved in the testing and regression process, how many sets of test cases were executed, how many defects were discovered, whether all defects were fixed, and whether the repair of defects caused new functional defects or performance defects. When presenting the results of the test items such as functionality, performance efficiency, and information system security, it is essential to clearly state whether the test results have passed.
After the personnel of the assessment department complete the CNAS qualification assessment report, an internal review must be conducted within the department first. Only after passing the internal review can it be submitted to the quality department for review. The Quality Department strictly reviews the assessment reports in accordance with the requirements of the national Accreditation review Group for laboratories. Those that fail the review cannot be stamped with the CNAS qualification. For some CNAS assessment requirements that lack assessment process documents, they need to be rectified and resubmitted to the Quality Department for review until the review is passed.
